重庆分公司
重庆分公司，新征程启航
为企业提供网站建设、域名注册、服务器等服务
SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密-创新互联
- 项目地址
https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh
孟津ssl适用于网站、小程序/APP、API接口等需要进行数据传输应用场景，ssl证书未来市场广阔！成为创新互联公司的ssl证书销售渠道，可以享受市场价格4-6折优惠！如果有意向欢迎电话联系或者加微信：13518219792（备注：SSL证书合作）期待与您的合作！testssl.sh 是一个免费且开源的功能丰富的命令行工具，用于在 Linux/BSD 服务器上检查支持加密，协议和一些加密缺陷的支持 TLS/SSL 加密的服务。
testssl
git clone --depth 1 --branch 2.9.5 https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh.git- 错误
Fatal error: Neither "dig", "host", "drill" or "nslookup" is present
- 解决方法
[root@localhost testssl.sh]# yum install bind-utils -y- 常用参数
-b，-v：这2个是显示版本的testssl自身的信息
-V：输出现有的本机密码套件列表
-t（--startssl）：指明要测试的协议：
https ，ftp，smtp，pop3，imap，xmpp，telnet，ldap，postgres，mysql，
其中 telnet，ldap，postgres ，mysql 这4个协议要指定openssl
--mode < serial| parallel> 模式，默认是串行模式，若多核CPU大规模测试可选并行
--parallel：选项启用并行测试 （默认是串行），等同于 --mode parallel
-e：测试每个密码套件
-E：测试每个协议（SSL2 SSL3 TLS1 TLS1.1 TLS1.2
）
-s (--std)：测试加密强度很高的一些密码套件
-p（--protocols ) ：测试每个TLS与SSL协议 并且检测 spdy 与 http2
-S：测试并显示服务器端证书信息
-P：测试并显示服务器偏好（也就是服务器优先配置的TLS协议和密码套件）
-x（ --single-cipher）： 指定一个密码套件，也就是测试一下是否支持指定的这个套件
-c：测试客户端支持情况
-h （--header）：测试是否支持 HSTS, HPKP， cookie ，ipv4 ，代理 ，安全头部等
-U：测试所有的漏洞
所有漏洞
-H, --heartbleed：tests for Heartbleed vulnerability
-I, --ccs, --ccs-injection：tests for CCS injection vulnerability
-T, --ticketbleed：tests for Ticketbleed vulnerability in BigIP loadbalancers
-R, --renegotiation：tests for renegotiation vulnerabilities
-C, --compression, --crime：tests for CRIME vulnerability (TLS compression issue)
-B, --breach：tests for BREACH vulnerability (HTTP compression issue)
-O, --poodle：tests for POODLE (SSL) vulnerability
-Z, --tls-fallback：checks TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV mitigation
-W, --sweet32：tests 64 bit block ciphers (3DES, RC2 and IDEA): SWEET32 vulnerability
-A, --beast：tests for BEAST vulnerability
-L, --lucky13：tests for LUCKY13
-F, --freak：tests for FREAK vulnerability
-J, --logjam：tests for LOGJAM vulnerability
-D, --drown：tests for DROWN vulnerability
-f, --pfs, --fs, --nsa：checks (perfect) forward secrecy settings
-4, --rc4, --appelbaum：which RC4 ciphers are being offered?
-6：支持ipv6
--ip [one]： 直接测试ip所指向的地址，不使用DNS解析出来的ip地址； 参数one 是指使用NDS解析返回的第一个IP地址，因为很多站点会有多个IP，那么会重复测试多次。
-n (--nodns) ：不使用DNS
--sneaky：在服务器端少留痕迹
--quiet：不输出banner
--fast：只显示第一个密码套件 与-P 合用
--log：输出文档（有默认名称）
--logfile：指定一个输出文档
--json：json格式的文档 （有默认名称）
--jsonfile：指定一个json格式文档
--csv：csv格式的文档 （有默认名称）
--csvfile：指定一个csv 格式文档
--html：html 格式文档 （有默认名）
--htmlfile：指定一个html文档
--append：允许追加
- 测试
[root@localhost testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh --quiet 172.16.216.188
Start 2018-11-10 23:08:40 -->> 172.16.216.188:443 (172.16.216.188) <<--
rDNS (172.16.216.188): --
Service detected: HTTP
Testing protocols via sockets except SPDY+HTTP2
SSLv2 not offered (OK)
SSLv3 not offered (OK)
TLS 1 offered
TLS 1.1 offered
TLS 1.2 offered (OK)
SPDY/NPN http/1.1 (advertised)
HTTP2/ALPN http/1.1 (offered)
Testing ~standard cipher categories
NULL ciphers (no encryption) not offered (OK)
Anonymous NULL Ciphers (no authentication) not offered (OK)
Export ciphers (w/o ADH+NULL) not offered (OK)
LOW: 64 Bit + DES encryption (w/o export) not offered (OK)
Weak 128 Bit ciphers (SEED, IDEA, RC[2,4]) not offered (OK)
Triple DES Ciphers (Medium) not offered (OK)
High encryption (AES+Camellia, no AEAD) offered (OK)
Strong encryption (AEAD ciphers) offered (OK)
Testing robust (perfect) forward secrecy, (P)FS -- omitting Null Authentication/Encryption, 3DES, RC4
PFS is offered (OK) ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA
Elliptic curves offered: prime256v1 secp384r1 secp521r1 X25519 X448
Testing server preferences
Has server cipher order? yes (OK)
Negotiated protocol TLSv1.2
Negotiated cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Cipher order
TLSv1: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA AES256-SHA
TLSv1.1: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA AES256-SHA
TLSv1.2: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA
ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA AES256-SHA
Testing server defaults (Server Hello)
TLS extensions (standard) "renegotiation info/#65281" "EC point formats/#11" "session ticket/#35" "next protocol/#13172"
"max fragment length/#1" "application layer protocol negotiation/#16" "encrypt-then-mac/#22"
"extended master secret/#23"
Session Ticket RFC 5077 hint 300 seconds, session tickets keys seems to be rotated < daily
SSL Session ID support yes
Session Resumption Tickets: yes, ID: no
TLS clock skew Random values, no fingerprinting possible
Server Certificate #1 (in response to request w/o SNI)
Signature Algorithm ECDSA with SHA384
Server key size RSA 2048 bits
Fingerprint / Serial SHA1 126CAC24E8D08ED4BB90B330D166929C57D39A0D / 92F43BDFF9AC3B5CAA3189D661C69AFA
SHA256 5C9AD396AE017DC395BF9720D3D00BAC6C5C28CBF1AA2D921F32930B125F9336
Common Name (CN) www.linuxplus.com
subjectAltName (SAN) missing (NOT ok) -- Browsers are complaining
Issuer root_ca (CAdevops from CN)
Trust (hostname) certificate does not match supplied URI
Chain of trust NOT ok (chain incomplete)
EV cert (experimental) no
Certificate Expiration 294 >= 60 days (UTC: 2018-11-05 21:27 --> 2019-09-01 21:27)
# of certificates provided 1
Certificate Revocation List NOT ok -- neither CRL nor OCSP URI provided
OCSP URI --
OCSP stapling --
OCSP must staple no
DNS CAA RR (experimental) --
Certificate Transparency no
Server Certificate #2 (in response to request w/o SNI)
Signature Algorithm ECDSA with SHA256
Server key size ECDSA 256 bits
Fingerprint / Serial SHA1 F8DBD1BC27D744AC23C31C505C58FB55B33C7085 / 92F43BDFF9AC3B5CAA3189D661C69AFC
SHA256 5C7FAD30072D151AD5D6EA1EC0CCA669C6C7A1E8CB66E3AC2341502763723409
Common Name (CN) www.linuxplus.com
subjectAltName (SAN) missing (NOT ok) -- Browsers are complaining
Issuer root_ca (CAdevops from CN)
Trust (hostname) certificate does not match supplied URI
Chain of trust NOT ok (chain incomplete)
EV cert (experimental) no
Certificate Expiration 364 >= 60 days (UTC: 2018-11-10 22:32 --> 2019-11-10 22:32)
# of certificates provided 1
Certificate Revocation List NOT ok -- neither CRL nor OCSP URI provided
OCSP URI --
OCSP stapling --
OCSP must staple no
DNS CAA RR (experimental) --
Certificate Transparency no
Testing HTTP header response @ "/"
HTTP Status Code 200 OK
HTTP clock skew 0 sec from localtime
Strict Transport Security --
Public Key Pinning --
Server banner nginx/1.15.5
Application banner --
Cookie(s) (none issued at "/")
Security headers --
Reverse Proxy banner --
Testing vulnerabilities
Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) not vulnerable (OK), no heartbeat extension
CCS (CVE-2014-0224) not vulnerable (OK)
Ticketbleed (CVE-2016-9244), experiment. not vulnerable (OK)
Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555) not vulnerable (OK)
Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation not vulnerable (OK)
CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK)
BREACH (CVE-2013-3587) no HTTP compression (OK) - only supplied "/" tested
POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) not vulnerable (OK)
TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK)
SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) not vulnerable (OK)
FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK)
DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK)
make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services
https://censys.io/ipv4?q=5C9AD396AE017DC395BF9720D3D00BAC6C5C28CBF1AA2D921F32930B125F9336 could help you to find out
LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected
BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) TLS1: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA
AES256-SHA
VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols (possible mitigation): TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses cipher block chaining (CBC) ciphers with TLS
RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) no RC4 ciphers detected (OK)
Testing 359 ciphers via OpenSSL plus sockets against the server, ordered by encryption strength
Hexcode Cipher Suite Name (OpenSSL) KeyExch. Encryption Bits Cipher Suite Name (RFC)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
xc030 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDH 256 AESGCM 256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
xc02c ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDH 256 AESGCM 256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
xc014 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA ECDH 256 AES 256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
xc00a ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDH 256 AES 256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
x35 AES256-SHA RSA AES 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
xc02f ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDH 256 AESGCM 128 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
xc02b ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDH 256 AESGCM 128 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
xc027 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDH 256 AES 128 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256
xc009 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDH 256 AES 128 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
x2f AES128-SHA RSA AES 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
Running client simulations via sockets
Android 2.3.7 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA
Android 4.1.1 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Android 4.3 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Android 4.4.2 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Android 5.0.0 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Android 6.0 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Android 7.0 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
Chrome 51 Win 7 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
Chrome 57 Win 7 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
Firefox 49 Win 7 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Firefox 53 Win 7 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
IE 6 XP No connection
IE 7 Vista TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
IE 8 XP No connection
IE 8 Win 7 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
IE 11 Win 7 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
IE 11 Win 8.1 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
IE 11 Win Phone 8.1 Update TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
IE 11 Win 10 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Edge 13 Win 10 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Edge 13 Win Phone 10 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Opera 17 Win 7 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Safari 5.1.9 OS X 10.6.8 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Safari 7 iOS 7.1 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Safari 9 OS X 10.11 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Safari 10 OS X 10.12 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Apple ATS 9 iOS 9 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Tor 17.0.9 Win 7 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Java 6u45 TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA
Java 7u25 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Java 8u31 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
OpenSSL 1.0.1l TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
OpenSSL 1.0.2e TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
Done 2018-11-10 23:10:25 [ 107s] -->> 172.16.216.188:443 (172.16.216.188) <<--
[root@www testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh -c --quiet --html 172.16.216.188
[root@www testssl.sh]# ll *.html
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5687 11月 24 15:59 172.16.216.188_p443-20181124-1558.html
[root@www testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh -c --quiet --log 172.16.216.188
[root@www testssl.sh]# ll *.log
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 985 11月 24 16:04 172.16.216.188_p443-20181124-1604.log[root@www testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh --quiet -U 172.16.216.188
Start 2018-11-24 16:06:40 -->> 172.16.216.188:443 (172.16.216.188) <<--
rDNS (172.16.216.188): --
Service detected: HTTP
Testing vulnerabilities
Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) not vulnerable (OK), no heartbeat extension
CCS (CVE-2014-0224) not vulnerable (OK)
Ticketbleed (CVE-2016-9244), experiment. not vulnerable (OK)
Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555) not vulnerable (OK)
Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation not vulnerable (OK)
CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK)
BREACH (CVE-2013-3587) no HTTP compression (OK) - only supplied "/" tested
POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) not vulnerable (OK)
TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK)
SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) not vulnerable (OK)
FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK)
DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK)
make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services
https://censys.io/ipv4?q=5C9AD396AE017DC395BF9720D3D00BAC6C5C28CBF1AA2D921F32930B125F9336 could help you to find out
LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected
BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) TLS1: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA
AES256-SHA
VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols (possible mitigation): TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses cipher block chaining (CBC) ciphers with TLS
RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) no RC4 ciphers detected (OK)
另外有需要云服务器可以了解下创新互联scvps.cn，海内外云服务器15元起步，三天无理由+7*72小时售后在线，公司持有idc许可证，提供“云服务器、裸金属服务器、高防服务器、香港服务器、美国服务器、虚拟主机、免备案服务器”等云主机租用服务以及企业上云的综合解决方案，具有“安全稳定、简单易用、服务可用性高、性价比高”等特点与优势，专为企业上云打造定制，能够满足用户丰富、多元化的应用场景需求。
当前名称：SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密-创新互联
转载源于：http://cqcxhl.cn/article/ccpjoo.html