SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密

项目地址

https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh

创新互联长期为近1000家客户提供的网站建设服务，团队从业经验10年，关注不同地域、不同群体，并针对不同对象提供差异化的产品和服务；打造开放共赢平台，与合作伙伴共同营造健康的互联网生态环境。为上犹企业提供专业的成都做网站、网站建设、外贸营销网站建设，上犹网站改版等技术服务。拥有10余年丰富建站经验和众多成功案例,为您定制开发。

testssl.sh 是一个免费且开源的功能丰富的命令行工具，用于在 Linux/BSD 服务器上检查支持加密，协议和一些加密缺陷的支持 TLS/SSL 加密的服务。

testssl

git clone --depth 1 --branch 2.9.5 https://github.com/drwetter/testssl.sh.git

错误
Fatal error: Neither "dig", "host", "drill" or "nslookup" is present
解决方法

[root@localhost testssl.sh]# yum install bind-utils -y

常用参数
-b，-v：这2个是显示版本的testssl自身的信息
-V：输出现有的本机密码套件列表
-t（--startssl）：指明要测试的协议：
https ，ftp，smtp，pop3，imap，xmpp，telnet，ldap，postgres，MySQL，
其中 telnet，ldap，postgres ，mysql 这4个协议要指定openssl
--mode < serial| parallel> 模式，默认是串行模式，若多核CPU大规模测试可选并行
--parallel：选项启用并行测试（默认是串行），等同于 --mode parallel
-e：测试每个密码套件
-E：测试每个协议（SSL2 SSL3 TLS1 TLS1.1 TLS1.2
）
-s (--std)：测试加密强度很高的一些密码套件
-p（--protocols ) ：测试每个TLS与SSL协议并且检测 spdy 与 http2
-S：测试并显示服务器端证书信息
-P：测试并显示服务器偏好（也就是服务器优先配置的TLS协议和密码套件）
-x（ --single-cipher ）：指定一个密码套件，也就是测试一下是否支持指定的这个套件
-c：测试客户端支持情况
-h （--header）：测试是否支持 HSTS, HPKP， cookie ，ipv4 ，代理，安全头部等
-U：测试所有的漏洞

所有漏洞
-H, --heartbleed：tests for Heartbleed vulnerability
-I, --ccs, --ccs-injection：tests for CCS injection vulnerability
-T, --ticketbleed：tests for Ticketbleed vulnerability in BigIP loadbalancers
-R, --renegotiation：tests for renegotiation vulnerabilities
-C, --compression, --crime：tests for CRIME vulnerability (TLS compression issue)
-B, --breach：tests for BREACH vulnerability (HTTP compression issue)
-O, --poodle：tests for POODLE (SSL) vulnerability
-Z, --tls-fallback：checks TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV mitigation
-W, --sweet32：tests 64 bit block ciphers (3DES, RC2 and IDEA): SWEET32 vulnerability
-A, --beast：tests for BEAST vulnerability
-L, --lucky13：tests for LUCKY13
-F, --freak：tests for FREAK vulnerability
-J, --logjam：tests for LOGJAM vulnerability
-D, --drown：tests for DROWN vulnerability
-f, --pfs, --fs, --nsa：checks (perfect) forward secrecy settings
-4, --rc4, --appelbaum：which RC4 ciphers are being offered?

-6：支持ipv6
--ip [one]：直接测试ip所指向的地址，不使用DNS解析出来的ip地址；参数one 是指使用NDS解析返回的第一个IP地址，因为很多站点会有多个IP，那么会重复测试多次。
-n (--nodns) ：不使用DNS
--sneaky：在服务器端少留痕迹
--quiet：不输出banner
--fast：只显示第一个密码套件与-P 合用
--log：输出文档（有默认名称）
--logfile：指定一个输出文档
--json：json格式的文档（有默认名称）
--jsonfile：指定一个json格式文档
--csv：csv格式的文档（有默认名称）
--csvfile：指定一个csv 格式文档
--html：html 格式文档（有默认名）
--htmlfile：指定一个html文档
--append：允许追加

测试

[root@localhost testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh --quiet 172.16.216.188             

 Start 2018-11-10 23:08:40        -->> 172.16.216.188:443 (172.16.216.188) <<--

 rDNS (172.16.216.188):  --
 Service detected:       HTTP

 Testing protocols via sockets except SPDY+HTTP2 

 SSLv2      not offered (OK)
 SSLv3      not offered (OK)
 TLS 1      offered
 TLS 1.1    offered
 TLS 1.2    offered (OK)
 SPDY/NPN   http/1.1 (advertised)
 HTTP2/ALPN http/1.1 (offered)

 Testing ~standard cipher categories 

 NULL ciphers (no encryption)                  not offered (OK)
 Anonymous NULL Ciphers (no authentication)    not offered (OK)
 Export ciphers (w/o ADH+NULL)                 not offered (OK)
 LOW: 64 Bit + DES encryption (w/o export)     not offered (OK)
 Weak 128 Bit ciphers (SEED, IDEA, RC[2,4])    not offered (OK)
 Triple DES Ciphers (Medium)                   not offered (OK)
 High encryption (AES+Camellia, no AEAD)       offered (OK)
 Strong encryption (AEAD ciphers)              offered (OK)

 Testing robust (perfect) forward secrecy, (P)FS -- omitting Null Authentication/Encryption, 3DES, RC4 

 PFS is offered (OK)          ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
                              ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
                              ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA 
 Elliptic curves offered:     prime256v1 secp384r1 secp521r1 X25519 X448 

 Testing server preferences 

 Has server cipher order?     yes (OK)
 Negotiated protocol          TLSv1.2
 Negotiated cipher            ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Cipher order
    TLSv1:     ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA AES256-SHA 
    TLSv1.1:   ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA AES256-SHA 
    TLSv1.2:   ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
               ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA
               ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA AES256-SHA 

 Testing server defaults (Server Hello) 

 TLS extensions (standard)    "renegotiation info/#65281" "EC point formats/#11" "session ticket/#35" "next protocol/#13172"
                              "max fragment length/#1" "application layer protocol negotiation/#16" "encrypt-then-mac/#22"
                              "extended master secret/#23"
 Session Ticket RFC 5077 hint 300 seconds, session tickets keys seems to be rotated < daily
 SSL Session ID support       yes
 Session Resumption           Tickets: yes, ID: no
 TLS clock skew               Random values, no fingerprinting possible 

  Server Certificate #1 (in response to request w/o SNI)
   Signature Algorithm          ECDSA with SHA384
   Server key size              RSA 2048 bits
   Fingerprint / Serial         SHA1 126CAC24E8D08ED4BB90B330D166929C57D39A0D / 92F43BDFF9AC3B5CAA3189D661C69AFA
                                SHA256 5C9AD396AE017DC395BF9720D3D00BAC6C5C28CBF1AA2D921F32930B125F9336
   Common Name (CN)             www.linuxplus.com
   subjectAltName (SAN)         missing (NOT ok) -- Browsers are complaining
   Issuer                       root_ca (CAdevops from CN)
   Trust (hostname)             certificate does not match supplied URI
   Chain of trust               NOT ok (chain incomplete)
   EV cert (experimental)       no 
   Certificate Expiration       294 >= 60 days (UTC: 2018-11-05 21:27 --> 2019-09-01 21:27)
   # of certificates provided   1
   Certificate Revocation List  NOT ok -- neither CRL nor OCSP URI provided
   OCSP URI                     --
   OCSP stapling                --
   OCSP must staple             no
   DNS CAA RR (experimental)    --
   Certificate Transparency     no

  Server Certificate #2 (in response to request w/o SNI)
   Signature Algorithm          ECDSA with SHA256
   Server key size              ECDSA 256 bits
   Fingerprint / Serial         SHA1 F8DBD1BC27D744AC23C31C505C58FB55B33C7085 / 92F43BDFF9AC3B5CAA3189D661C69AFC
                                SHA256 5C7FAD30072D151AD5D6EA1EC0CCA669C6C7A1E8CB66E3AC2341502763723409
   Common Name (CN)             www.linuxplus.com
   subjectAltName (SAN)         missing (NOT ok) -- Browsers are complaining
   Issuer                       root_ca (CAdevops from CN)
   Trust (hostname)             certificate does not match supplied URI
   Chain of trust               NOT ok (chain incomplete)
   EV cert (experimental)       no 
   Certificate Expiration       364 >= 60 days (UTC: 2018-11-10 22:32 --> 2019-11-10 22:32)
   # of certificates provided   1
   Certificate Revocation List  NOT ok -- neither CRL nor OCSP URI provided
   OCSP URI                     --
   OCSP stapling                --
   OCSP must staple             no
   DNS CAA RR (experimental)    --
   Certificate Transparency     no

 Testing HTTP header response @ "/" 

 HTTP Status Code             200 OK
 HTTP clock skew              0 sec from localtime
 Strict Transport Security    --
 Public Key Pinning           --
 Server banner                nginx/1.15.5
 Application banner           --
 Cookie(s)                    (none issued at "/")
 Security headers             --
 Reverse Proxy banner         --

 Testing vulnerabilities 

 Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160)                not vulnerable (OK), no heartbeat extension
 CCS (CVE-2014-0224)                       not vulnerable (OK)
 Ticketbleed (CVE-2016-9244), experiment.  not vulnerable (OK)
 Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555)      not vulnerable (OK)
 Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation     not vulnerable (OK)
 CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929)                not vulnerable (OK)
 BREACH (CVE-2013-3587)                    no HTTP compression (OK)  - only supplied "/" tested
 POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566)               not vulnerable (OK)
 TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507)              Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK)
 SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329)    not vulnerable (OK)
 FREAK (CVE-2015-0204)                     not vulnerable (OK)
 DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703)      not vulnerable on this host and port (OK)
                                           make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services
                                           https://censys.io/ipv4?q=5C9AD396AE017DC395BF9720D3D00BAC6C5C28CBF1AA2D921F32930B125F9336 could help you to find out
 LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental      not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected
 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389)                     TLS1: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA
                                                 AES256-SHA 
                                           VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols (possible mitigation): TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
 LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental     potentially VULNERABLE, uses cipher block chaining (CBC) ciphers with TLS
 RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808)        no RC4 ciphers detected (OK)

 Testing 359 ciphers via OpenSSL plus sockets against the server, ordered by encryption strength 

Hexcode  Cipher Suite Name (OpenSSL)       KeyExch.   Encryption  Bits     Cipher Suite Name (RFC)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 xc030   ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384       ECDH 256   AESGCM      256      TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384              
 xc02c   ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384     ECDH 256   AESGCM      256      TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384            
 xc014   ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA              ECDH 256   AES         256      TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA                 
 xc00a   ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA            ECDH 256   AES         256      TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA               
 x35     AES256-SHA                        RSA        AES         256      TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA                       
 xc02f   ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256       ECDH 256   AESGCM      128      TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256              
 xc02b   ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256     ECDH 256   AESGCM      128      TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256            
 xc027   ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256           ECDH 256   AES         128      TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256              
 xc009   ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA            ECDH 256   AES         128      TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA               
 x2f     AES128-SHA                        RSA        AES         128      TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA                       

 Running client simulations via sockets 

 Android 2.3.7                TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA
 Android 4.1.1                TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Android 4.3                  TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Android 4.4.2                TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Android 5.0.0                TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Android 6.0                  TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Android 7.0                  TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
 Chrome 51 Win 7              TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
 Chrome 57 Win 7              TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
 Firefox 49 Win 7             TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Firefox 53 Win 7             TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 253 bit ECDH (X25519)
 IE 6 XP                      No connection
 IE 7 Vista                   TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 IE 8 XP                      No connection
 IE 8 Win 7                   TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 IE 11 Win 7                  TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 IE 11 Win 8.1                TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 IE 11 Win Phone 8.1 Update   TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 IE 11 Win 10                 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Edge 13 Win 10               TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Edge 13 Win Phone 10         TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Opera 17 Win 7               TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Safari 5.1.9 OS X 10.6.8     TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Safari 7 iOS 7.1             TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Safari 9 OS X 10.11          TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Safari 10 OS X 10.12         TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Apple ATS 9 iOS 9            TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Tor 17.0.9 Win 7             TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Java 6u45                    TLSv1.0 AES128-SHA
 Java 7u25                    TLSv1.0 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 Java 8u31                    TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 OpenSSL 1.0.1l               TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
 OpenSSL 1.0.2e               TLSv1.2 ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)

 Done 2018-11-10 23:10:25 [ 107s] -->> 172.16.216.188:443 (172.16.216.188) <<--

SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密

[root@www testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh -c --quiet --html 172.16.216.188
[root@www testssl.sh]# ll *.html
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root  5687 11月 24 15:59 172.16.216.188_p443-20181124-1558.html
[root@www testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh -c --quiet --log 172.16.216.188
[root@www testssl.sh]# ll *.log
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 985 11月 24 16:04 172.16.216.188_p443-20181124-1604.log

[root@www testssl.sh]# ./testssl.sh --quiet -U 172.16.216.188   

 Start 2018-11-24 16:06:40        -->> 172.16.216.188:443 (172.16.216.188) <<--

 rDNS (172.16.216.188):  --
 Service detected:       HTTP

 Testing vulnerabilities 

 Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160)                not vulnerable (OK), no heartbeat extension
 CCS (CVE-2014-0224)                       not vulnerable (OK)
 Ticketbleed (CVE-2016-9244), experiment.  not vulnerable (OK)
 Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555)      not vulnerable (OK)
 Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation     not vulnerable (OK)
 CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929)                not vulnerable (OK)
 BREACH (CVE-2013-3587)                    no HTTP compression (OK)  - only supplied "/" tested
 POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566)               not vulnerable (OK)
 TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507)              Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK)
 SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329)    not vulnerable (OK)
 FREAK (CVE-2015-0204)                     not vulnerable (OK)
 DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703)      not vulnerable on this host and port (OK)
                                           make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services
                                           https://censys.io/ipv4?q=5C9AD396AE017DC395BF9720D3D00BAC6C5C28CBF1AA2D921F32930B125F9336 could help you to find out
 LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental      not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected
 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389)                     TLS1: ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES128-SHA
                                                 AES256-SHA 
                                           VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols (possible mitigation): TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
 LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental     potentially VULNERABLE, uses cipher block chaining (CBC) ciphers with TLS
 RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808)        no RC4 ciphers detected (OK)

SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密

名称栏目：SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密
文章起源：http://cqcxhl.cn/article/jshopc.html

重庆分公司，新征程启航

SSL/TLS深度解析--测试TLS/SSL加密

testssl

其他资讯